Theory of intelligent creation (t2)

Why I don't cite sources

The approach to the topics I discuss here is so new that I would like to "start all over again" or, in other words, "make everything new". Over the past few years, I have repeatedly tried to find reliable sources on topics related to the scientific analysis of the Creator's intelligent contribution to creation. Unfortunately, I have not found such sources.

I also did not find any systems that would be a source that would refer to my theses in some way. I also did not want to deny anyone's views or criticize them based on my findings. I also did not feel entitled to look for errors in these studies. The value of my work is that I do not refer to previous findings regarding the existence of God and His activity. I believe that in the framework of full independence I cannot accept orders, rigors and dogmas imposed from above by political, religious, philosophical systems and local social traditions. Not seeing any improvement in the sphere of global relations between people for years, I decided that I cannot rely on bad tradition.

Due to the subject matter I was dealing with, I could place some hope in the biblical texts. That is why I had been collecting information about them for many years. Unfortunately, the results of this research and searching have greatly reduced my confidence in their source authenticity. It was hard for me to accept the facts of the "editing" of the so-called Scriptures by the writers of Judaism, as independent researchers of Judaism told me. Their content later influenced the Old Testament. To my knowledge, they did not include the teachings of the persecuted and even killed prophets. I was also shocked by the information about how the content of the Gospels was shaped during the First Council of Nicaea. However, I was most shocked by the multiple "changes" to the content of the New Testament records made throughout the Middle Ages by various Christian "editors". This lasted for over a thousand years until the Reformation. Then, starting in the sixteenth century, the biblical texts were translated into many modern languages, whose cultural roots were distant from the words spoken two thousand years ago in Aramaic. This also applies to translations made in Greek and Latin. In view of all this, it is difficult for me to rely on “editorial” versions of the Old and New Testament texts concerning most facts, but I do not want to engage in their deeper analysis and criticism here, because that is not the task of this study. In general, this has greatly limited my use of these sources.

At this point, I would like to add that in my research I sympathize with the persecuted and murdered scientists, as well as with people who were once treated unjustly because of their views inconvenient to the religious authorities. Their works were unpublished, burned, and they were forced to recant their views by torture. In this way, they were “silenced”. I am now trying to reconstruct these texts based on fragmentary information in other publications. In regaining independent opinions, such as the one I represent here, I was helped, and still am helped, by very honest people. That is why I will not refer to unreliable sources.

For now, I have established that we live in a reality that "does not fit" the Personality of the Original Being. At the same time, I have assumed that true reality comes from Him. I have used its state as a comparative plane to create my theory. In addition, I have noticed that despite many searches, there has not been such an approach as I have used in my studies. That is why I decided not to use other sources. However, I do not hide the fact that in the findings and assumptions of my theory, I was inspired by theoretical astrophysics, which still has an influence on my imagination. However, I was most inspired by another field of theoretical physics, namely quantum mechanics. I have studied its findings in relation to my theory. However, I do not refer here to the findings of Max Plank, Paul Dirac or Werner Heisenberg. I am rather interested in what has been proven in science for years. Namely, it is about the historical relay race of generations of science, sometimes shaken by revolutionary discoveries. However, I still maintain a distance from the findings of scientists, because many of their theses are still unfinished. As a result, in the main assumptions and theses of my theory, I did not stick rigidly to the scientific findings, as I had already done with the findings of theologians.

So, I decided not to use any footnotes or references to other authors, which the author usually places at the bottom of the page. I do not want to refer to other studies, to authorities in individual fields, or to use texts that I do not trust. Perhaps this attitude will be criticized, but with the tasks that I set for myself, I had to rely on an unusual, i.e. innovative approach to my work.